Question: Once and for all, was 911 a government conspiracy? I seem to find conflicting accounts online.
Answer: We may never know for sure, but it seems that a shift in public opinion occurred in 2005 around an article published in Popular Mechanics .
“What should go down as a knock-out blow to the 9/11 denier
movement–Which Michael Shermer called “just about one of the best
things ever done in the history of skepticism,”–is the now-famous
Popular Mechanics article turned into a best-selling book that
debunked many of the top points the conspiracy theorists relied on.
Joining a chorus of mainstream publications including Skeptic and
taking the central claims head on, the PM article became a prime mover
for the 9/11 denier movement’s undoing.
The Popular Mechanics article was published in its March 2005
issue (#2) and became an Internet hit after the live debate hosted by
Democracy Now between Popular Mechanics editors Jim Meigs and David
Dunbar and Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas. In the
aftermath of that debate–if this is any indicator of which side
presented the better case–that article became the most popularly
searched item pertaining to 9/11 conspiracies and, from that point on,
the skeptical perspective became the dominant voice pertaining to the
movement. The conversation was brought to the mainstream, and the
mainstream made its decision.
Today, the 9/11 conspiracy movement is a shell of what it once
was. The website masquerading as an academic journal, Journal of 9/11
Studies, has dropped from a high of six articles in its August 2006
issue to one in March, and its two most recent editions (it’s supposed
to be updated monthly) were simply skipped over, evidently for lack of
a single article.” (#1)
–#1: Ray, John. “How Skeptics Confronted 9/11 Conspiracy Advocates.”
Skeptic (Altadena, Calif.) 14.2 (2008): 16-17. OmniFile Full Text
Mega. Web. 13 Apr. 2010
–#2: “9/11: Debunking the Myths.” Popular Mechanics 182.3 (2005):
70-81. OmniFile Full Text Mega. Web. 13 Apr. 2010.
Question: Yeah, but what about the pentagon? That’s where sh*t gets really weird. And also, a rebuttal. http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html
Answer: I think anything that is shrouded in so much secrecy deserves the most ardent conspirators:
“On January 18, 2002, U.S. District Court judge Leonie Brinkerna made a fateful ruling that would have profound consequences on the public’s ability to understand the nature of the September 11, 2001, attacks and of the enemy that conducted them. Judge Brinkema ruled that court proceedings in the case of the United States versus suspected 9/11 co-conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui could not be broadcast in any way.”
–Rosenthal, John. “Doing Justice to Zacarias Moussaoui.” Policy ReviewOmniFile Full Text Mega. Web. 19 Apr. 2010. 2007/January Dec. 2008: 39-61.
And, interestingly enough, you are not alone in your beliefs:
“A 2006 Scripps Survey Research Center poll revealed that 36 percent of all Americans think that the government was responsible for the September 11, 2001, attacks, but they differ on the extent of the blame.”
–Constant, Paul. “Towers of Babble.” Utne Jan./Feb. 2008: 64-9. OmniFile Full Text Mega. Web. 19 Apr. 2010.
“Swami and colleagues offer a preliminary psychological profile of people who believe in conspiracies about the September 11, 2001and identified several traits—backing one or more conspiracy theories unrelated to the attacks, frequently talking about conspiracy beliefs relate to the attacks with like-minded friends and others, taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, feeling generally suspicious toward others, and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook—associated with subscribing to conspiracy theories about the events of September 11, 2001. The findings appear to be consistent with the theory that that conspiracy thinkers constitute a community of believers.”
–Bower, Bruce. “Tracing the inner world of suspicion.” Science News 175.13 (2009): 11. OmniFile Full Text Mega. Web. 19 Apr. 2010.